Assorted inanity.

 


Why is Facebook going public?
They couldn’t figure out the privacy settings, either.

Waka Waka.

Why is Facebook going public?

They couldn’t figure out the privacy settings, either.

Waka Waka.

What Twitter sees in small business - Fortune Tech

caterpillarcowboy:

Totally forgot to share this, but I was interviewed by Fortune / CNN two weeks ago on Twitter’s foray into the small business advertising arena. I basically say that I think Twitter is playing SMBs for fools and taking their money without showing ROI. It worked for Google with AdWords for years, so I don’t blame them. But SMBs really should stay away from stuff they don’t understand. If you understand analytics and CPC, CPA, CAC then go for it. If you don’t, focus on making a better cupcake.

Absolutely.

Same can be said about Facebook, too.

Experimented with a small ad budget for a client on Facebook recently.

My quick takes:

  • If you’re a large, national brand, then Facebook advertising can probably work for you.
  • If you’re a small, localized brand, use Facebook’s keyword/Likes and geographical targeting options effectively, and track it closely, then Facebook advertising may work for you. Maybe. Really, it’s not that easy. To do it right, at least. And can get costly, fast.

It’s for folks in the middle where I think it’s largely ineffective:

  • If you’re a small brand in a densely populated area, or with regional or national aspirations, then Facebook advertising is a waste.

And you can insert Google/Twitter above and the conclusion is the same.

As far as Twitter goes, there are already tools available that can provide for localized search/keyword targeting. And they’re free. And rather than just spit out a sponsored tweet or auto-follow, viewing keywords “intratweet” and in context can provide you a valuable opportunity to engage with a potential new lead/customer/fan and actually start a fruitful conversation versus just badgering them with a boilerplate response.

Check out GeoChirp, for one.

In short, “GeoChirp helps you search for people Twittering for specific things in a specific area.”

You just:

  1. Choose your location
  2. Put in your search term
  3. Set the radius
  4. And view results

You can follow results by subscribing to an RSS feed. (Read more on GeoChirp here).

Pretty powerful stuff. Talk about targeting…

And on Twitter, there’s only 140 characters to work with. There’s not much room for nuance! Using Dave’s cupcake shop example, if someone around you tweets:

“I just had the most incredible banana cream cupcake at my niece’s b-day party! My favorite! [Insert obligatory Instagram food porn pic here]

…then that’s about 99% of the targeting you need, no? Next to word-of-mouth or a warm referral from a friend or existing customer of yours, you can’t do much better than that. Why pay Twitter/Facebook/Google a dime when you can connect with someone on a one-to-one basis and tailor your response based on a known, stated, common interest? It’s far more authentic and you can use your own voice.

“Hey @suchandsuch, I’d put our banana cream frosting up against any in the world!!! Come on down and I’ll give you a sample on the house!”

The fact that Twitter is a giant “open” conversation means a) unlike with the walled gardens of Facebook, or the anonymous algorithms of Google, you can engage anyone, personally, and b) you can be hyper-granular in targeting your likely audience. Seems to me to be far more valuable than the “throw a bunch of crap against the wall and see what sticks” model of mass advertising with it’s .01% click through rates.

And as a user, aren’t you happier to receive word about something you love vs. that for another Brazilian wax treatment all because you’re a “Female, aged 18-34?”

Get real.

Does curating an audience this way take work? Sure. Easy? Nothing worthwhile ever is. There’s no silver bullet in building an audience for your business online, but one truth about social is that you get out of it what you put into it. Signing up for an ad budget doesn’t take a lot of time and effort. Consequently, I’ll wager that the “leads” you get out of those efforts will pale in quality next to the ones that you originated organically on your own using your own voice, and your own thumbs, one tweet at a time.

Feel free to reblog, comment, or ping me on Twitter @mbrosen to discuss in more detail.

The splash screen elicited laughter all around. It’s such a bitmap paean to the tackiest and most self-parodying of baller “culture”; it might as well be an app Tom Haverford slapped together in Parks And Recreation. But it does, at a glance, sum up what Girls Around Me is all about: a radar overlaid on top of a Google Map, out of which throbs numerous holographic women posing like pole dancers in a perpetual state of undress.

Using a creepy app to teach people about protecting their privacy.  (via flavorpill)

Whoa.

Joe Schmitt: Who are the most hated characters of Web 2.0?

joeschmitt:

We were tossing this around the office today, @taylorlecroy and I. Among those already on our list:

  • Tweet thieves
  • People who Instagram every meal
  • Photo over-taggers
  • Habitual Facebook cause inviters
  • Tightly knit #FF circles
  • People who only check your blog to try to take things out of context and get you in trouble
  • Farmville & Mafia Wars players
  • Daily mugshots
  • People who don’t star my tweets
  • People from Twitter who friend you on Facebook but don’t follow you on Twitter
  • People from Twitter who friend you on Facebook but don’t tell you what their Twitter name is
  • Salesmen who connect with you after one vendor presentation and then ask you to recommend them on LinkedIn
  • #hashtag #every #single #word
  • Monsters who try to excuse their bullyish behavior with “it’s just the internet”
  • Push every 4square check-in to Twitter and FB
  • People who click every link and then blame “the Inter-net” when their FB account is hacked
  • @guykawasaki
  • People on Twitter who have become more popular than me
  • Oversharers who subsequently complain because people know too much about their business
  • Grammar Nazis (except for me)
  • People who post photos of their ugly baby every damn day
  • Pokers
  • People who find love on the internet and live happily ever after, rubbing your nose in it with every cute post
  • Require reciprocal follows
  • People who push everything everywhere— Twitter, FB, 4square, Instagram, LinkedIn, Posterous, Tumblr, Blip, etc.
  • Words With Friends cheaters

Who would you add? Reply, reblog, and retweet with your favorite villains.

  • Amateur Politicos
  • Aspiring rappers who ask you to check out their homemade music videos on YouTube and RT to your followers
My friend’s Facebook status update:

dealing with that type of person who uses his post.harvard.edu address well into his thirties.

Ha.
P.S. Zuckerberg?

My friend’s Facebook status update:

dealing with that type of person who uses his post.harvard.edu address well into his thirties.

Ha.

P.S. Zuckerberg?

So, should Tumblr join the ‘feed’ fray?

Like when someone you follow comments on another user’s post, whom you are not following.

Or when anyone else ‘likes’ or reblogs a post that you have liked or reblogged.

Also, if/when someone comments on/reblogs your post, how about an e-mail notification?

How about a basic activity feed down the right-hand side of the Dashboard?

Right now, you only see your friends’ activity in the Dashboard (and I gather most Tumblr users consume Tumblr via the Dashboard, not by visiting the individual blogs directly) [UPDATE: Wrong assumption. David Karp of Tumblr says only about 10% of Tumblr traffic comes via the Dashboard or tumblr.com. Figures as of May 2008.], and that doesn’t do much to foster new connections across the community.

Tumblr seems stuck between being a blogging platform and a full-blown social network.

Sure, Facebook does this, but those are likely people you know.  That said, Twitter has shown that many people are indeed somewhat interested in what complete strangers have to say, as well.

Thoughts?

frangry:
Apparently, this is the kind of ad I generate on Facebook.
Was served up this ‘Single With Herpes?’ gem a while back:
mbrosen:


Seriously with this ad, Facebook?  Seriously??? And they can probably track who clicks and then one day will be hacked and reveal all the herpsters…and –— wait —– that will be a funny day.  Carry on.

frangry:

Apparently, this is the kind of ad I generate on Facebook.

Was served up this ‘Single With Herpes?’ gem a while back:

mbrosen:

Facebook Herpes Ad

Seriously with this ad, Facebook?  Seriously??? And they can probably track who clicks and then one day will be hacked and reveal all the herpsters…and –— wait —– that will be a funny day.  Carry on.
Seriously with this ad, Facebook?  Seriously??? And they can probably track who clicks and then one day will be hacked and reveal all the herpsters…and –— wait —– that will be a funny day.  Carry on.

Seriously with this ad, Facebook?  Seriously??? And they can probably track who clicks and then one day will be hacked and reveal all the herpsters…and –— wait —– that will be a funny day.  Carry on.