Thornton Melon’s First Economics Class
Rodney Dangerfield in Back To School.
One of my favorite scenes.
In 1988, I invested most of the earnings from this lecture circuit acquiring the leasehold on Connecticut’s Stratford Inn. Hotels, inns and restaurants have always held a special fascination for me. The Stratford Inn promised the realization of a longtime dream to own a combination hotel, restaurant and public conference facility — complete with an experienced manager and staff.
In retrospect, I wish I had known more about the hazards and difficulties of such a business, especially during a recession of the kind that hit New England just as I was acquiring the inn’s 43-year leasehold. I also wish that during the years I was in public office, I had had this firsthand experience about the difficulties business people face every day. That knowledge would have made me a better U.S. senator and a more understanding presidential contender.
Today we are much closer to a general acknowledgment that government must encourage business to expand and grow. Bill Clinton, Paul Tsongas, Bob Kerrey and others have, I believe, changed the debate of our party. We intuitively know that to create job opportunities we need entrepreneurs who will risk their capital against an expected payoff. Too often, however, public policy does not consider whether we are choking off those opportunities.
My own business perspective has been limited to that small hotel and restaurant in Stratford, Conn., with an especially difficult lease and a severe recession. But my business associates and I also lived with federal, state and local rules that were all passed with the objective of helping employees, protecting the environment, raising tax dollars for schools, protecting our customers from fire hazards, etc. While I never have doubted the worthiness of any of these goals, the concept that most often eludes legislators is: “Can we make consumers pay the higher prices for the increased operating costs that accompany public regulation and government reporting requirements with reams of red tape.” It is a simple concern that is nonetheless often ignored by legislators.
A Politician’s Dream Is a Businessman’s Nightmare: A 1992 column on the realities of running a business, by George McGovern, the 1972 Democratic presidential candidate, who passed away at the age of 90 in October.
Timely read.
Danny DeVito as “Larry the Liquidator:”
“Buggy Whip” speech from Other People’s Money.
I’ve posted this before, and it’s beyond belief that he even needs one within his own field, but if Mitt Romney needs a defense of his tenure at Bain for the upcoming debates, he could hardly do better than the above speech.
Also:
There is a huge net benefit for society from Schumpeterian capitalism, but there are losers, as economist Michael Cox of the Dallas Fed points out in this great article (and table) on creative destruction at the Library of Economics and Liberty:
A society cannot reap the rewards of creative destruction without accepting that some individuals might be worse off, not just in the short term, but perhaps forever. At the same time, attempts to soften the harsher aspects of creative destruction by trying to preserve jobs or protect industries will lead to stagnation and decline, short-circuiting the march of progress. Schumpeter’s enduring term reminds us that capitalism’s pain and gain are inextricably linked. The process of creating new industries does not go forward without sweeping away the preexisting order. … The disruption of lost jobs and shuttered businesses is immediate, while the payoff from creative destruction comes mainly in the long term. As a result, societies will always be tempted to block the process of creative destruction, implementing policies to resist economic change.Attempts to save jobs almost always backfire. Instead of going out of business, inefficient producers hang on, at a high cost to consumers or taxpayers. The tinkering short circuits market signals that shift resources to emerging industries. It saps the incentives to introduce new products and production methods, leading to stagnation, layoffs, and bankruptcies.
Danny DeVito as “Larry the Liquidator:”
“Buggy Whip” speech from Other People’s Money.
As I’ve been saying in various conversations with people for the last 6 months or so, my biggest concern regarding a recovery in job growth is this:
The economy has been able to grow even without adding workers because employers have found ways to accomplish more with fewer workers. Productivity grew at a robust rate of 8.1 percent in the third quarter of 2009, the most recent data available.
My thought is that continued high productivity numbers will keep many companies from hiring en masse. Output is up so much with current personnel. Why take on new salaries? And until consumers are back in force (Ed. - not anytime soon), the demand isn’t there to ramp up output through a new round of hiring. CapEx spending will continue to be the next wave in the short term.
See the full article here for an analysis of the GDP numbers (they’re always revised down), a disclaimer on the effects of tighter inventory management, exports and the cheap dollar.